MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743892018 · doi:10.1111/cge.13121

Bone health and <i><scp>SATB2</scp></i>‐associated syndrome

2017· review· en· W2743892018 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuri A. Zárate, Michelle Steinraths, Allison Matthews, Wendy E. Smith, Angela Sun, Louise C. Wilson, Caroline Brain, J. Allgove, Benjamin Jacobs, Jennifer L. Fish, Cynthia M. Powell, Wyeth W. Wasserman, Clara D. van Karnebeek, Emma Wakeling, Nina Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Genetics · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome British ColumbiaMichael Smith Health Research BCBC Children's HospitalGenome Canada
KeywordsMedicineBone mineralOsteopeniaOsteoporosisOsteomalaciaInternal medicinePediatricsBone densitySkeletal disorderEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SATB2-associated syndrome (SAS) is a rare disorder caused by alterations in the special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2). Skeletal abnormalities such as tibial bowing, osteomalacia, osteopenia or osteoporosis have been reported suggesting a higher frequency of skeletal complications in SAS. The optimal timing, necessity, and methodology for routine assessment of bone health in individuals with SAS, however, remain unclear. We report molecular and phenotypic features of 7 individuals with SAS documented to have low bone mineral density (BMD) ascertained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), often preceded by tibial bowing. The lowest BMD Z-scores ranged -2.3 to -5.6. In 4 individuals, total alkaline phosphatase levels were elevated (2 with elevated bone fraction) around the time of low BMD documentation. A clinically significant fracture history and a diagnosis of pediatric osteoporosis were present in 4 individuals. Pamidronate treatment in 2 children improved BMD. In conclusion, low BMD, fractures, and tibial bowing are relatively common skeletal complications in individuals with SAS. DXA is a useful tool when evaluating a child with SAS suspected to have low BMD and the results might alter clinical management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.358
GPT teacher head0.540
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical GeneticsSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207