MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743898403 · doi:10.60082/2817-5069.3164

“Honorary Protestants”: The Jewish School Question in Montreal, 1867-1997 by David Fraser

2017· article· en· W2743898403 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jory Binder

Bibliographic record

VenueOsgoode Hall law journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtestantismCitizenshipJudaismSociologyIdentity (music)Economic JusticeLawPolitical scienceReligious studiesGender studiesTheologyAestheticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the aftermath of the 2016 US election, where new and disturbing constructions of otherness have once more become part of society’s legal and cultural discourse, Honorary Protestants finds a unique and unexpected poignancy. Fraser’s book reminds us how notions of equality, identity, citizenship, and justice reflect the attitudes of both individual communities and the broader society, and can be fully realized only through action, unity, and mutual understanding. When the British North America (BNA) Act was passed in 1867, section 93 guaranteed religious educational rights. Education was divided along religious lines, comprising of both Roman Catholic and Protestant denominational schools. Catholics and Protestants in Quebec enjoyed the right to denominational schools, but those rights did not extend to any other group—particularly, the Montreal Jewish community, who had a distinct and visible minority presence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0370.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOsgoode Hall law journalSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207