MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743902441 · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2017.8002202

Design of a simple neural network stabilizer for a synchronous machine of power system via MATLAB/Simulink

2017· article· en· W2743902441 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Masrob, M.A. Rahman, Glyn George, Casey Butt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMATLABStabilizer (aeronautics)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceSimple (philosophy)Control theory (sociology)Power (physics)Electric power systemControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsControl (management)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a simple artificial neural network power system stabilizer (SANN-PSS) is presented for a synchronous generator with IEEE type-1 excitation system connected to the infinite bus through a transmission line. Conventional design techniques use a linearized single machine infinite bus system to design a power system stabilizer (PSS) based on the transfer function between the automatic voltage regulator input and resultant developed electrical torque by the synchronous generator. Because the power system is highly nonlinear, with configurations and parameters that change with time, the conventional PSS cannot guarantee good performance in a realistic operational environment. Therefore, a SANN-PSS has been simulated to improve the system dynamics performance and to adapt the controller's parameters in real time due to any changes in operating conditions using MATLAB Simulink. The results validate the efficacy of the proposed SANN-PSS over a wide range of operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207