MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743909645 · doi:10.2134/agronj2017.03.0141

Effect of Sugarbeet Density and Harvest Date on Most Profitable Nitrogen Rate

2017· article· en· W2743909645 on OpenAlexafffund
Amanda H. DeBruyn, I. P. O’Halloran, John D. Lauzon, Laura L. Van Eerd

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersAgricultural Adaptation CouncilUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsFertilizerSucroseAgronomyYield (engineering)Field experimentTonneCaneMathematicsBiologyChemistrySugar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas First evaluation of profitable N rates in sugarbeet using variable revenue and costs. Most profitable N rate was 136 kg N ha−1, regardless of plant density or harvest date. More fertilizer N needed to maximize root yield than profits or sucrose yield (recoverable white sucrose per tonne). Opportunity to modify payment structure to reward sucrose over root yield. Risk of potential N losses was lower with higher plant density and later harvest. The response of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) root and sucrose yield to N fertility is well known, but the influence of recent changes of higher plant densities and/or earlier harvest dates may influence optimal fertilizer N rates. An experiment, in a split‐plot design, was established in 2013 to 2015 at two locations each year. There were 10 whole plot treatments consisting of combinations of five N rates and two plant densities and subplot of harvest date (mid‐September, late October). A lack of interactions among N rate, harvest date, and plant density for root or sucrose yield and profit margins, suggested no need to adjust fertilizer N based on these production practices. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) indices and N remaining in the field at harvest suggest a higher potential for N loss with an early than late harvest and at low vs. high plant densities; therefore, from an environmental perspective and based on equivalent profit margins, late harvest and high plant densities were recommended. Based on regression analysis, the N fertilizer rate to maximize root yield, recoverable white sucrose per tonne (RWST) and profit margins was 157, 12, and 136 kg N ha−1, respectively. Less fertilizer N (113 vs. 152 kg N ha−1) was required with legume compared to grass species as the previous crop. This was the first study in a humid, temperate climate to establish recommended fertilizer N rates based on profit margins and identify an opportunity to restructure grower payments to encourage higher RWST.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomy JournalSame topicIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementFrench-language works237,207