MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744024646 · doi:10.5555/3107979.3107981

DEVS-based modeling of cached and segmented video download algorithms in LTE-A cellular networks

2017· article· en· W2744024646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications and Networking Symposium · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDEVSComputer scienceCellular networkLTE AdvancedCacheComputer networkFormalism (music)Cellular trafficUser equipmentAlgorithmDistributed computingTelecommunications linkReal-time computingModeling and simulationBase stationSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellular networks have witnessed increasing demands for higher data rates in the recent years. Satisfying these demands presents a challenge for cellular network operators. Video traffic plays a major role in this, as it accounted for more than half of the data traffic on cellular networks recently. Device-to-Device (D2D) communication, introduced by the Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) standard, allows direct communication between User Equipments (UE) in the network. We proposed cached and segmented video download algorithms that employ D2D communication to improve the throughput of video transmission over LTE-A cellular networks. Here, we present the Modeling and Simulation (M&S) of an LTE-A network that implements the proposed algorithms. We used the Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) formalism to model the network. Simulation results show that significant improvements are achieved by the proposed algorithms in terms of the average and aggregate data rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it