A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ADIPOSITY AND SPORT INJURY RISK IN YOUTH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Obesity, defined as an accumulation of excessive fat mass that impairs health, is associated with lower levels of neuromuscular control including balance and coordination, which may place youth with higher adiposity at greater risk for injury during sport participation. On the opposite end of the spectrum, excessively low fat mass can also pose an injury risk. Objective To determine if adiposity is a risk factor for sport injury in children and adolescents. Design Systematic Review. Methods Ten electronic databases were systematically searched using key words and Medical Sub-Heading terms. Studies selected included: English language; original data; analytic design; adiposity measurement by age- and sex-adjusted body mass index (BMI) or body fat using imaging, impedance or predictive methods and; children, adolescents and young adults ≤20 years who sustained a musculoskeletal injury during sport or recreation participation that resulted in medical attention or time loss from sport or activities. PRISMA guidelines were followed and studies were assessed by two independent raters. Level of evidence was assessed using the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine model. Results Of 8029 potentially relevant records, 44 were included in the final review. 75% of these studies were of prospective cohort design (level 2b evidence). Twenty-one studies concluded that a BMI rating of overweight/obese is a significant risk factor for injury; the majority (12/21) of these studies assessed lower extremity injury (e.g. ankle sprain and medial tibial stress syndrome). Nineteen studies showed no association between anthropometric measurement and injury; the majority (14/19) assessed all sport injury. Finally, a BMI rating of underweight (4 studies) was more commonly associated with risk of stress fracture. Conclusions There is consistent level 2b evidence that a rating of overweight/obesity is associated with lower extremity injury. Anthropometric risk of injury appears to be dependent on type and site of injury in youth sport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.050 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.021 | 0.021 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".