MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744118842 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2017.8010130

A high-speed traffic manager architecture for flow-based networking

2017· article· en· W2744118842 on OpenAlexafffund
Imad Benacer, François-Raymond Boyer, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork packetComputer networkTraffic shapingQuality of servicePacket processingScheduling (production processes)Field-programmable gate arrayByteEmbedded systemQueueing theoryNetwork processorNetwork traffic controlOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a fast traffic manager architecture targeting to meet some requirements of the 5G next generation cellular communication technology, and of the high-speed networking devices in the software defined networking context. Also, an important goal is to reduce latency to a minimum in order to best support the upcoming 5G. The proposed traffic manager functionalities are policing, scheduling, shaping, and queuing of incoming traffic (packets) on egress ports in a network processing unit. Policing, scheduling, and shaping guarantee that packets are sent in such a way to meet the allowed bandwidth quotas for each flow, and enforce some desired quality of service. The implemented architecture is based on the C coding language and is synthesized with the Vivado High Level Synthesis tool. A throughput improvement of 2.0× over previous reported works is claimed. The proposed design of the traffic manager is capable of providing 15.8 Gbps per egress port for 64 byte sized packets, and it works at 93 MHz when implemented with a Zynq 7000 FPGA from Xilinx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207