Interactions of Polyaromatic Compounds. Part 2. Flocculation Probed by Dynamic Light Scattering and Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In part 1 of this series of papers, the results of electron spray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation revealed a close relationhsip between nanoaggregation of polyaromatic (PA) compounds and their chemical structures. In this paper, we present the results of investigating the flocculation of fractionated asphaltenes and synthesized PA molecules by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Together, these two papers complement one another and draw a full picture of asphaltene aggregation. Three asphaltene fractions were obtained on the basis of their different adsorption characteristics onto calcium carbonate. The DLS results suggest that the irreversibly adsorbed (Irr-Ads) asphaltenes containing the highest number of polar groups are the fraction of asphaltenes responsible for the observed flocculation in whole asphaltenes. To better understand the aggregation behavior of asphaltenes, flocculation of three synthesized PA compounds, N -(1-hexylhepyl)- N ′-(5-carboxypentyl)perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic bisimide (C5Pe), N -(1-undecyldodecyl)- N ′-(5-carboxypentyl)-perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic bisimide (C5PeC11), and N, N ′-bis(1-undecyldodecyl)perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic bisimide (BisAC11), was further studied using DLS. The observed flocculation corresponds well with the results of studying nanoaggregation using ESI-MS. The flocculation of PA compounds was found enhanced with increasing heptane content in the solvent. Among the three synthesized PA compounds studied, C5PeC11 showed flocculation kinetics similar to that of the Irr-Ads asphaltenes. Experiments using mixed PA compounds showed reduced flocculation of C5PeC11 in the presence of C5Pe under otherwise identical solution conditions. The presence of polar groups in PA molecules was proven to be critical in accelerating the flocculation of PA compounds beyond the nanoscale. The results from MD simulations showed that π–π stacking between polyaromatic cores, hydrogen bonding between polar groups, and tail–tail interactions among aliphatic chains all contribute to the observed flocculation of PA compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".