Preparation of large‐scale, durable, superhydrophobic PTFE films using rough glass templates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large superhydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) films, with good durability, were successfully prepared by a facile, low cost, environmentally friendly templating method, using a PTFE emulsion. For the first time, commercially available rough glass was employed as a reusable template. The results show that both the microstructure of the glass template and the concentration of the PTFE emulsion play important roles in the superhydrophobicity of the films. Commercially available, acid‐etched, rough glass is found to be an ideal template for such films, the superhydrophobicity increasing with decreasing emulsion concentration. Abrasive wear testing shows that superhydrophobic PTFE film, prepared under an optimal concentration of 5 wt% PTFE emulsion, has good abrasion resistance. Moreover, the results show that this method is suitable for the large‐scale preparation of superhydrophobic PTFE films. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".