MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744150265 · doi:10.15388/na.2017.3.3

Modeling and prescribed H-infinity tracking control for strict feedback nonlinear systems

2017· article· en· W2744150265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinear Analysis Modelling and Control · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemInfinityTracking (education)H-infinity methods in control theoryFeedback controlControl (management)Nonlinear controlMathematicsComputer scienceControl engineeringPhysicsMathematical analysisEngineeringPsychologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By utilizing backstepping technique, an H∞ robust controller with improved prescribed performance and dynamic surface control is designed for a class of strict feedback nonlinear systems. The transient and steady state performance for the tracking errors of nonlinear system can be guaranteed by using improved prescribed performance constraint. The dynamic surface control is used to overcome the differential explosion problem in the backstepping procedure. The impacts of uncertainties in the system are attenuated by H∞control. The performance and stability analysis proves that the controller design procedure is simple with low complexity and robustness. Finally, the simulation results verify the effectiveness of the controller. By comparing with the existing method, the proposed method has a faster convergence speed and better steady state performance, and also the controller design process is simpler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it