The socio-political influence of the Second World War Saskatchewan Aboriginal veterans, 1945-1960
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2 Alistar Sweeny, "Government Policy and Saskatchewan Indian Veterans : A Brief History of the Canadian Government's Treatment of Indian Veterans of World Two" (Ottawa : Tyler, Wright and Daniel Ltd .1979) ; Native Law Centre, "Indian Veterans' Rights" (Saskatoon : U of Saskatchewan, 1979) The Native Law Centre's report also investigated the inequity of the administration benefits for Indian veterans from the Soldiers Settlement Act after the First World War .3 Sweeny 55 .4 Sweeny 68 .Indians who enfranchised relinquished their status as Indians under the Indian Act and were no longer considered as wards of the government but citizens of Canada .Although there was a policy of forced enfranchise earlier in the century, this policy was not in effect during the war .'Native Law Centre 2 .6 Canada, "The Aboriginal Soldier After The Wars : Report of the Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples" (The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, 1995) .Hereafter cited as SSC . ' Canada, Looking Forward, Looking Back: Report of The Royal Commission on Aboriginal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".