L’APPROCHE QUANTITATIVE ET QUALITATIVE DANS LES ÉTUDES DU DÉVELOPPEMENT REGIONAL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo faz uma análise critica das observações quantitativas e qualitativas, principalmente nos estudos do desenvolvimento regional. Ele reflete sobre a influência da visão de mundo do pesquisador na escolha do método de análise. Os métodos quantitativos e qualitativos parecem complementares, principalmente no estudo do desenvolvimento regional. Os métodos quantitativos deixam sempre um resíduo a esclarecer para uma classificação qualitativa dos fatores psicosociais. As formas de análise de classes psicológicas exigem uma interpretação apurada, em função dos espaços, dos grupos, das ideologias do pesquisador e das suas concepções teóricas sobre a realidade, principalmente socioeconômica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it