MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744597646 · doi:10.4000/books.pup.7317

Pratique notariale dans une communauté de la Terre Ferme vénitienne entre les XVIe et XVIIe siècles

2008· book-chapter· fr· W2744597646 on OpenAlexaff
Donatella Bartolini

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente contribution se propose d’analyser la pratique notariale dans une petite communauté de la montagne vénitienne à travers les témoignages offerts par un notaire ayant exercé à Feltre de 1570 à 1609. Soumise à la Domination vénitienne au début du XVe siècle, Feltre durant toute la période moderne ne dépassa pas les 4 000 habitants dans le centre urbain et les 20 000 dans sa juridiction. Malgré ses dimensions réduites, elle avait toutes les qualités requises à une ville : un Conseil ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooksSame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207