Reservoir history matching using constrained ensemble Kalman filtering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The high heterogeneity of petroleum reservoirs, represented by their spatially varying rock properties (porosity and permeability), greatly dictates the quantity of recoverable oil. In this work, the estimation of the spatial permeability distribution, which is crucial for predicting the future performance of a reservoir, is carried out through a history matching technique based on constrained ensemble Kalman filtering (EnKF). The main contribution in this work is the novel implementation of hard and soft constraints in the recursive EnKF estimation methodology for petroleum reservoirs. Hard data is obtained from the actual values of the reservoir parameters at discrete locations obtained by core sampling and well logging, while the soft data considered is obtained from correlograms, which characterize the spatial correlation of the rock properties in a reservoir. In each time update, the parameter estimates obtained from the unconstrained EnKF are modified by one of two novel algorithms. In the first, the correlation matrix obtained after the unconstrained EnKF update is transformed to honour the true correlation structure from the correlogram by applying a projection‐based method. The second algorithm involves the use of a technique for soft constrained covariance localization. We observe that the soft data constrained localization method results in the best estimates of the permeability and also reduces the computational time significantly. We quantify the improvement in estimation performance of each of the constrained methods over unconstrained estimation. The method, while developed for estimation in petroleum reservoirs, is also generally applicable to systems with spatial heterogeneity and underlying spatial correlations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".