MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744728304 · doi:10.1109/ner.2017.8008397

Real-time feature extraction for multi-channel EEG signals time-frequency analysis

2017· article· en· W2744728304 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature extractionComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayShort-time Fourier transformTime–frequency analysisBrain–computer interfaceFeature (linguistics)Artificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)Pattern recognition (psychology)ElectroencephalographyComputer hardwareFourier transformComputer visionFourier analysisTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a model-based Field Programmable Gates Array (FPGA) design for real-time feature extraction of Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, which can be used for brainwaves bands classification to track and detect mental status in Brain Computer Interface (BCI) applications and consciousness studies. An model-based design approach is used to implement Short-time Fourier Transform (STFT) and extract 20 frequency feature components for classification. These 20 features are divided into 5 groups corresponding to 5 different brainwaves bands. Each feature is defined as the average power spectrum of a number of adjacent frequency components. A hardware model is designed using Xilinx System Generator and implemented on FPGA. Fixed-point is used instead of floating-point to increase operating speed for meeting timing requirement of the real-time system. The design is implemented on a Xilinx Zedboard at 50 MHz clock rate, and can be used for up to 128-channel EEG signals feature extraction at 250 Hz sample rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207