MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744800642 · doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2005.08.226

Cerebral Oxygenation During Defibrillation Threshold Testing of ICDS

2005· article· en· W2744800642 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth M. McNeill, R. Gagnon, James E. Potts, Charles R. Kerr, John A. Yeung‐Lai‐Wah, A. Wah-Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOxygenationOxygenAnesthesiaCardiologyDefibrillationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To evaluate cerebral cortical oxygenation and cellular homeostasis during defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing of ICDs by monitoring specific chromophores which reflect intravascular and mitochondrial levels of oxygenation. 11 patients (male = 9: age 64±11 yrs: LVEF 44±11%) underwent subpectoral ICD implantation and DFT testing under GA. Continuous measurements of the absolute changes in the concentrations of oxyhaemoglobin (HbO2), de-oxyhaemoglobin (Hb) and cytochrome c oxidase copper moiety (Cyt a,a3) were obtained using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). MABP was monitored simultaneously. All episodes of induced VF (n = 26; duration 13.1±9.7 sec; cycle length 230.2±20.8 msec) and VT (n = 2; duration 15±2.8 sec; cycle length 320±11.3 msec) resulted in a decrease in MABP (23.9±7.5 mmHg, p<0.05) and HbO2 (-4.2±1.7 μmol/L; p<0.05), an increase in Hb (2.7±1.4 μmol/L) and no change in Cyt a,a3 redox status (0.09±0.30 μmol/L). This is the first prospective trial to perform neuromonitoring with NIRS during DFT testing. Our results suggest that oxygen availability is maintained at the cellular intra-mitochondrial level, despite a reduction in oxygen delivery to the cerebral cortex during short episodes of induced VF and VT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207