MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744812979 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.025501

High-precision half-life determination for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Na</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> using a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> gas-proportional counter

2017· article· lv· W2744812979 on OpenAlexafffund
P. Finlay, A. T. Laffoley, G. C. Ball, P. C. Bender, M. R. Dunlop, R. Dunlop, G. Hackman, J. R. Leslie, A. D. MacLean, D. H. Miller, M. Moukaddam, B. Olaizola, N. Severijns, J. K. Smith, D. Southall, C. E. Svensson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityTRIUMFUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Research Council CanadaVlaamse regeringNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekCanada Research ChairsTRIUMF
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high-precision half-life measurement for the superallowed ${\ensuremath{\beta}}^{+}$ transition between the isospin $T=1/2$ mirror nuclei $^{21}\mathrm{Na}$ and $^{21}\mathrm{Ne}$ has been performed at the TRIUMF-ISAC radioactive ion beam facility yielding ${T}_{1/2}=22.4506(33)$ s, a result that is a factor of 4 more precise than the previous world-average half-life for $^{21}\mathrm{Na}$ and represents the single most precisely determined half-life for a transition between mirror nuclei to date. The contribution to the uncertainty in the $^{21}\mathrm{Na} \mathcal{F}{t}^{\mathrm{mirror}}$ value due to the half-life is now reduced to the level of the nuclear-structure-dependent theoretical corrections, leaving the branching ratio as the dominant experimental uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207