MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744834618 · doi:10.14288/cjur.v2i1.188502

Exploring Contraceptive Service Delivery on the Thailand-Burma Border

2016· article· en· W2744834618 on OpenAlexaff
Hayley Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Economic growthReproductive healthService delivery frameworkService (business)Face (sociological concept)Family planningPolitical scienceHealth servicesGeographyPopulationGender studiesSocioeconomicsMedicineBusinessSociologyResearch methodologyEnvironmental healthSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Historical tensions have been a predominant problem along the Thailand-Burma border for decades. As a result, women residing in the surrounding areas have received inadequate reproductive health care. This structured literature review aimed to answer the question ‘what barriers do women living along the Thailand-Burma border face when trying to access contraception?”. The findings demonstrated that women are facing five main barriers to access proper contraceptive methods, these are: legal, geographical, security, educational, and socio-demographic. The researcher concluded that work needs to be done on a local and global scale to improve the situation for women in the Thailand-Burma border.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207