Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La formation en grammaire des futurs enseignants de français est périodiquement discutée, l'enseignement grammatical demeurant un terrain de profondes tensions et contradictions. À l'heure de changements majeurs qui affectent les systèmes éducatifs universitaires et les publics scolaires, il importe de faire le point. Quels sont les finalités, approches, dispositifs et contenus de formation en grammaire dans les institutions académiques francophones ? Quelles doivent être les exigences de la formation, compte tenu des connaissances préalables des étudiants, des prescriptions et des besoins des élèves ? Cet ouvrage réunit des contributions de didacticiens belges, français, québécois et suisses. Formateurs aguerris, ces auteurs font le pari que plusieurs des problèmes de l’enseignement grammatical peuvent être résolus par la mise en œuvre d’une formation initiale dotant les enseignants d’outils qui leur permettent de maitriser eux-mêmes les phénomènes linguistiques complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it