ESTUDOS PARA POSICIONAMENTO ÓTIMO DE PAINÉIS FOTOVOLTAICOS NAS LATITUDES AMAZÔNICAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO: O conceito de ângulo de inclinação ótimo para painéis solares é esclarecido com o uso de equações de um sistema de coordenadas celeste equatorial, concluindo com o pensamento geral de que esse ângulo é igual à latitude do lugar, se desprezarmos os efeitos de refração atmosférica dos raios solares.Esse conceito é expandido usando-se fórmulas astronômicas para analisar a variação da incidência solar ao longo do dia e do ano, que combinado com metodologia desenvolvida pelo National Renewable Energy Laboratory e adaptado para as condições locais, permite derivar-se gráficos ou cartas solares, para as latitudes do estado do Pará (0 a 4 graus norte e 0 a 8 graus sul) e até o sul do Brasil, para serem usados na avaliação de perdas de energia em função da direção e inclinação dos painéis solares.Essas cartas também são usadas para confrontar resultados de testes da chamada orientação Leste-Oeste, indicando uma conformidade dos testes com as cartas solares produzidas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".