MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744969568 · doi:10.22408/reva1220174770-90

Pensando a práxis pedagógica hodierna em face das correntes contemporâneas sobre aprendizagem

2017· article· pt· W2744969568 on OpenAlexaff
Cristina Novikoff, Adriana Castro, Dayse Barreto, Darlene De Queiroz, Marcelo Bustamante Chilingue, Márcia Luiza Machado Figueira, Maria Elenir de Oliveira Anselmo, Patrik Dos Santos, Renata Felício, R. Vidal Pía, Sandra Elisa de Assis Freire, Simone Costa Nunes, Vânia Oliveira, Viviana Gondim De Carvalho, Wilmar Peixoto

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Valore · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsImpactNovelis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyFace (sociological concept)HumanitiesLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo discute numa ótica pedagógico-filosófica as correntes contemporâneas de pensamentos que mais influenciaram o existir humano no que diz respeito à questão do ensino-aprendizagem. Resultante de atividade pedagógica nasce da mediação por meio de perguntas a cada tarefa cumprida, num período de 15 encontros entre mestrandos e professora. Apresenta-se, portanto, aspectos fundamentais do processo de ensino e aprendizagem que espelham a realidade hodierna e suas problemáticas epistemológicas que marcam o cotidiano pedagógico, seja na pratica de ensino, seja na didática ou na aprendizagem. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: educação, correntes pedagógicas, contemporaneidade, complexidade, pós-modernidade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.024
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista ValoreSame topicEducation Pedagogy and PracticesFrench-language works237,207