MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745020603 · doi:10.1139/cjss-2017-0062

Agronomists’ Views on the Potential to Adopt Beneficial Greenhouse Gas Nitrogen Management Practices Through Fertilizer Management

2017· article· en· W2745020603 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
B. D. Amiro, Mario Tenuta, Krista Hanis-Gervais, Xiaopeng Gao, Don Flaten, Christine Rawluk

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaManitoba Rural Adaptation CouncilCanada Research ChairsGovernment of CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern Grains Research Foundation
KeywordsGreenhouse gasNitrous oxideEnvironmental scienceYield (engineering)NitrogenFertilizerAgronomyGreenhouseAgricultural engineeringBusinessEngineeringChemistryMaterials scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agronomists in Manitoba, Canada, are willing to reduce soil nitrous oxide emissions. They consider: enhanced efficiency fertilizers if cost effective; both crop yield and financial returns to be important for application rate; preferred fall application instead of spring because of operational advantages; and using banding placement if appropriate equipment is available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207