Lichenoid esophagitis presenting as fatal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a 52 year-old woman: a case diagnosed by autopsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: "Lichenoid esophagitis" is a descriptive term for a lichenoid pattern of inflammation in the esophagus for which a precise histologic diagnosis cannot be established. The differential diagnosis includes lichen planus, a drug-related reaction, and viral infection. Lichenoid esophagitis causing death has not been reported previously. We describe a case, diagnosed by autopsy, of lichenoid esophagitis in which massive bleeding from generalized epithelial sloughing and a large longitudinal ulcer proved fatal. CASE PRESENTATION: A 52 year-old diabetic woman collapsed at her home in front of an acquaintance. "Bloody vomit" was noted. Despite resuscitation efforts, the patient died. A complete autopsy was performed. The middle portion of the esophagus showed a 9 cm longitudinal ulcer situated 12 cm from the esophago-gastric junction. Microscopic examination showed complete sloughing of the esophageal epithelium with a striking subepithelial lichenoid lymphocytic infiltrate extending into the muscularis mucosae. The findings were considered compatible with lichenoid esophagitis. Laboratory studies also showed the presence of diabetic ketoacidosis. CONCLUSIONS: Lichenoid esophagitis is an appropriate diagnostic term when clinical, histologic and laboratory findings do not allow for specific categorization of lichenoid inflammation in the esophagus. As illustrated here for the first time, lichenoid esophagitis may cause ulceration and mucosal sloughing severe enough to result in massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding and death. Translating these autopsy findings to the clinical setting, it is possible that the endoscopic finding of a longitudinal mid-esophageal ulcer in the presence of proximal stricture may be indicative of underlying lichenoid esophagitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".