Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cada vez mais o design se insere em nosso cotidiano e se encontra presente em praticamente tudo o que nos cerca. Prova disso é que vemos surgir a todo instante segmentos intitulados como “de design” ou “com design”, seja em produtos, seja em serviços. Parece que essas designações são empregadas de forma que a nomenclatura ou a palavra “design” agregue e demonstre valores diferenciados, muitas vezes de forma indiscriminada e como puro apelo de marketing ou publicidade. Mas encontramos propostas que utilizam a designação design respeitando seu real significado e aplicação. É o caso dos hotéis de design que são impregnados do discurso contemporâneo, incluindo evidentemente o do consumo. É sobre eles que vamos falar nesta edição do segundo aniversário de dObra[s]. Queremos comemorar convidando e propondo a todos viagens a territórios que exploram das maneiras mais diversas a sensibilidade, a criatividade e a irreverência.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".