MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745251744 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2017.2687418

Spike-Like Blending Noise Attenuation Using Structural Low-Rank Decomposition

2017· article· en· W2745251744 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hebei ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsNoise (video)Computer scienceAttenuationRank (graph theory)Spike (software development)Synthetic dataBottleneckData setGeologyAlgorithmData miningArtificial intelligenceMathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spikelike noise is a common type of random noise existing in many geoscience and remote sensing data sets. The attenuation of spike-like noise has become extremely important recently, because it is the main bottleneck when processing the simultaneous source data that are generated from the modern seismic acquisition. In this letter, we propose a novel low-rank decomposition algorithm that is effective in rejecting the spike-like noise in the seismic data set. The specialty of the low-rank decomposition algorithm is that it is applied along the morphological direction of the seismic data sets with a prior knowledge of the morphology of the seismic data, which we call local slope. The seismic data are of much lower rank along the morphological direction than along the space direction. The morphology of the seismic data (local slope) is obtained via a robust plane-wave destruction method. We use two simulated field data examples to illustrate the algorithm workflow and its effective performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it