MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745463125 · doi:10.1177/1687814017726922

Improvement of the damping capacity of the linear damper with an oil groove in the linear guideway system

2017· article· en· W2745463125 on OpenAlexaff
Nan Ke, Hutian Feng, Zengtao Chen, Yi Ou, Jianwen Feng, Shengpeng Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mechanical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Science and Technology Major Project
KeywordsDamperGroove (engineering)Damping capacityStructural engineeringViscosityDamping torqueEngineeringMaterials scienceVibrationMechanical engineeringComposite materialPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an experimental investigation into the damping characteristics of a linear damper with a newly designed oil groove. The damping performance of the damper is tested in four different viscosity grades by the sweep frequency method. And a test bench is used to move the damper for a several kilometers to examine the damping maintenance. The experimental results show that a higher oil viscosity leads to a higher damping capacity of the linear damper, and the increase in the oil viscosity will improve the damping maintenance of the damper. The newly designed oil groove efficiently improved the damping capacity of the linear damper; a proper oil selection will further optimize the effect of the oil groove via minimizing the oil leakage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Mechanical EngineeringSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207