Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan terhadap Simpanan Dana Pihak Ketiga Melalui Nisbah Bagi Hasil (Studi Kasus Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia Periode 2012-2015)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of the financial performance of third party funds through revenue sharing on Islamic banks during the period of the first quarter of 2012 until the second quarter 2015. The number of samples in this study are 7 companies, which are taken according to specific criteria banking company sharia is still registered during the observation period 2012-2015 which publishes quarterly financial reports during the study period Then hypothesis testing is done by using partial least square (PLS) 3.2.4. The results showed that a statistically significant effect on the financial performance of third party funds, financial performance significant effect on revenue sharing, profit sharing ratio did not significantly affect third-party funds and financial performance did not significantly affect third-party funds through revenue sharing.Keywords: Third-party funds, ratio of profit sharing, capital adequacy ratio (CAR), Non Performing Financing (NPF), Return on Assets (ROA), Operating Expenses Operating Income (ROA), and Financing to Deposit to ratio (FDR)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it