MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Connexin40 is required for NADPH oxidase‐derived oxidant production in microvascular endothelial cells

2008· article· en· W2745548444 on OpenAlexaff
Karel Tyml, Guotai Yu, Michael L. Bolon, Qing Shao, Dale W. Laird

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNADPH oxidaseReactive oxygen speciesCell biologyGap junctionChemistryIntracellularConnexinBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The function of connexins (Cx) may extend beyond gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC). We hypothesized that Cx40 is required for NADPH oxidase‐dependent ROS production in microvascular endothelial cells subjected to hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R), independent of GJIC. ROS generation and NADPH oxidase activation was assessed after H/R in confluent monolayers of cells of wild‐type (WT), Cx40−/−, gp91phox−/−, or p47phox−/− mice, as well as in monolayers of GJIC‐deficient SKHep1 cells overexpressing GFP‐tagged Cx40. In WT cells, H/R‐initiated ROS increase was not affected by the GJ blocker 18alpha‐glycyrrhetinic acid, nor by preventing cells from establishing contact with each other, but it was absent in Cx40−/− cells. H/R increased ROS in SKHep1 cells expressing Cx40‐GFP, but not in cells expressing the control vector. We also asked if Cx40‐dependent reduction in inter‐endothelial electrical coupling after H/R requires NADPH oxidase. H/R reduced coupling in WT and gp91phox−/− but not in p47phox−/− cells. We suggest that (1) H/R‐initiated signaling in microvascular endothelial cells involves cross‐talk between NADPH oxidase and Cx40, and (2) Cx40 is required for NADPH oxidase‐derived ROS production, independent of GJIC. (Support: HSFO).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207