MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745595611 · doi:10.1109/icip.2017.8296795

High-order local normal derivative pattern (LNDP) for 3D face recognition

2017· article· en· W2745595611 on OpenAlexafffund
Sima Soltanpour, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsLocal binary patternsDiscriminative modelPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceHistogramFace (sociological concept)Facial recognition systemDerivative (finance)Computer scienceOrientation (vector space)NormalSurface (topology)Computer visionDirectional derivativeComponent (thermodynamics)MathematicsImage (mathematics)PhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel descriptor based on the local derivative pattern (LDP) for 3D face recognition. Compared to the local binary pattern (LBP), LDP can capture more detailed information by encoding directional pattern features. It is based on the local derivative variations that extract high-order local information. We propose a novel discriminative facial shape descriptor, local normal derivative pattern (LNDP) that extracts LDP from the surface normal. Using surface normal, the orientation of a surface at each point is determined as a first-order surface differential. Three normal component images are extracted by estimating three components of normal vectors in x, y, and z channels. Each normal component is divided into several patches and encoded using LDP. The final descriptor is created by concatenating histograms of the LNDP on each patch. Experimental results on two famous 3D face databases, FRGC v2.0 and Bosphorus illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed descriptor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207