Effect of Ultrafast Imaging on Shear Wave Visualization and Characterization: An Experimental and Computational Study in a Pediatric Ventricular Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plane wave imaging in Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) captures shear wave propagation in real-time at ultrafast frame rates. To assess the capability of this technique in accurately visualizing the underlying shear wave mechanics, this work presents a multiphysics modeling approach providing access to the true biomechanical wave propagation behind the virtual image. This methodology was applied to a pediatric ventricular model, a setting shown to induce complex shear wave propagation due to geometry. Phantom experiments are conducted in support of the simulations. The model revealed that plane wave imaging altered the visualization of the shear wave pattern in the time (broadened front and negatively biased velocity estimates) and frequency domain (shifted and/or decreased signal frequency content). Furthermore, coherent plane wave compounding (effective frame rate of 2.3 kHz) altered the visual appearance of shear wave dispersion in both the experiment and model. This mainly affected stiffness characterization based on group speed, whereas phase velocity analysis provided a more accurate and robust stiffness estimate independent of the use of the compounding technique. This paper thus presents a versatile and flexible simulation environment to identify potential pitfalls in accurately capturing shear wave propagation in dispersive settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".