Deep Convolutional Computation Model for Feature Learning on Big Data in Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently, a large number of industrial data, usually referred to big data, are collected from Internet of Things (IoT). Big data are typically heterogeneous, i.e., each object in big datasets is multimodal, posing a challenging issue on the convolutional neural network (CNN) that is one of the most representative deep learning models. In this paper, a deep convolutional computation model (DCCM) is proposed to learn hierarchical features of big data by using the tensor representation model to extend the CNN from the vector space to the tensor space. To make full use of the local features and topologies contained in the big data, a tensor convolution operation is defined to prevent overfitting and improve the training efficiency. Furthermore, a high-order backpropagation algorithm is proposed to train the parameters of the deep convolutional computational model in the high-order space. Finally, experiments on three datasets, i.e., CUAVE, SNAE2, and STL-10 are carried out to verify the performance of the DCCM. Experimental results show that the deep convolutional computation model can give higher classification accuracy than the deep computation model or the multimodal model for big data in IoT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".