Être homosexuel et d’origine libanaise en contexte montréalais : identifications ethno-sexuelles multiples, complexes et variables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En nous inspirant des résultats de notre mémoire, nous rendons compte dans cet article des diverses façons dont certaines personnes LGBTQ+ d’origine libanaise, vivant à Montréal et impliquées au sein d’un organisme militant pour les droits des minorités sexuelles et racisées, articulent et négocient leurs identifications ethno-sexuelles. À partir d’un cadrage intersectionnel qui prend en considération l’imbrication de divers axes de structuration sociale que sont le genre, la classe, la sexualité, l’ethnicité, l’âge, etc., les résultats de cette recherche suggèrent qu’il existe une multiplicité de discours identitaires, ces derniers déstabilisant, dans certains cas, ou (re)produisant, dans d’autres, les représentations normatives de l’identité homosexuelle hégémonique fortement véhiculée actuellement en contexte occidental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".