MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746090999 · doi:10.7202/1040904ar

Une autre manière de modéliser les réseaux sociaux. Applications à l’étude de co-publications

2017· article· fr· W2746090999 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Monique Dalud-Vincent

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopological and Geometric Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrong
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyCombinatoricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article a pour objectif de montrer pourquoi et comment la prétopologie (domaine des mathématiques qui recouvre la théorie des graphes et la topologie) peut apporter une modélisation et un traitement plus souples et mieux adaptés des réseaux sociaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.015
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles perspectives en sciences socialesSame topicTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207