INCREASED PHOTORECEPTOR OUTER SEGMENT VOLUME FOLLOWING SYSTEMIC TREATMENT OF BIRDSHOT CHORIORETINOPATHY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Retinal degeneration in birdshot chorioretinopathy can be quantified using spectral domain optical coherence tomography by measuring the photoreceptor outer segment (PROS) volume. The purpose of this study was to determine if the PROS volume in BSCR responds to systemic immunomodulatory therapy (IMT). METHODS: Retrospective chart review with analysis of PROS volume derived from spectral domain optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: We identified a total of three patients who met our inclusion criteria. At baseline, all patients had abnormal PROS and/or ellipsoid layer findings on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. After systemic immunomodulatory therapy, these abnormalities improved, and PROS volume increased, in all patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PROS volume can increase after systemic treatment of birdshot chorioretinopathy. This SD-OCT parameter may serve as a useful marker of retinal degeneration in BSCR, and may be a useful outcome measure in monitoring treatment response in birdshot chorioretinopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".