Role of Li Concentration and the SEI Layer in Enabling High Performance Li Metal Electrodes Using a Phosphonium Bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide Ionic Liquid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study the performance of the lithium (Li) anode is characterized in two alternative ionic liquid electrolytes: (i) a solution of 0.5 mol·kg –1 of lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) in trimethyl(isobutyl)phosphonium FSI (P 111i4 FSI) and (ii) an equimolar mixture of these two salts, effectively an inorganic–organic mixture IL. We have investigated the formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) at the lithium electrode and its influence on the polarization potential, the electrode surface impedance and deposition morphologies. Lithium metal cycling is revealed to be significantly more stable in the electrolyte with high lithium salt concentration due to the creation of a more uniform SEI. Stable and effective cycling was demonstrated at high applied currents (up to 12 mA·cm –2 ) with large areal capacities being transferred with each polarization cycle (up to 6 mAh·cm –2 at 50 °C). An average Coulombic efficiency of not less than 99.2% was demonstrated under these conditions and SEM observations of the cycled electrode surfaces show a uniform and compact deposit. Combined with spectroscopic characterization of the electrolyte and electrode surface, these observations indicate a role for the speciation and transport properties of these high concentration ionic liquid electrolytes in modifiying the physicochemical properties of the SEI which result in enhanced cycling performance of the Li metal electrode.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".