MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746374726 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0299

Adaptive non‐linear neural control of wide‐area power systems

2017· article· en· W2746374726 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkController (irrigation)Adaptive controlElectric power systemLyapunov functionPower (physics)Control engineeringControl (management)Nonlinear systemEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the authors propose an adaptive neural network (NN) excitation control for wide‐area power systems. Compared with most existing approaches, the system dynamics is assumed to be totally unknown, which is approximated by a two‐layer NN in an online manner, i.e. no offline training is required. With the help of NN approximation, it is not necessary to pay much attention to system modelling since this modelling is of great difficulty and inaccurate. In addition, the tuning of controller parameters in most existing control designs is avoided as well, which simplifies the controller design. It is proved that all the signals in the closed loop are bound using Lyapunov analysis. Finally, numerical analysis has been conducted on an IEEE 39 Bus power system to verify the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it