Total Synthesis of β-<scp>d</scp>-<i>ido</i>-Heptopyranosides Related to Capsular Polysaccharides of <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i> HS:4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 6-deoxy-β-d-ido-heptopyranoside related to the capsular polysaccharides of C. jejuni HS:4 is very remarkable, owing to the unique, multifaceted structural features that have been combined into one molecule, which include (1) the rare ido-configuration, (2) the unusual 7-carbon backbone, and (3) the challenging β-(1→2)-cis-anomeric configuration. Two distinct strategies toward the total synthesis of this interesting target are reported. The first involved establishment of the β-d-idopyranosyl configuration from β-d-galactopyranosides, prior to a C-6-homologation extending the d-hexose to the desired 6-deoxy-d-heptose. However, this approach encountered difficulties due to the significantly reduced reactivity of the 6-position of the β-d-idopyranosides, so instead a second strategy was employed, which involved first carrying out a 6-homologation on the less flexible d-galactopyranose, followed by a very successful conversion to the desired β-d-ido-configuration found in the target heptopyranoside (2). This report is the first successful synthesis of the 6-deoxy-β-d-ido-heptopyranoside, which could possess interesting immunological properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".