MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746860940 · doi:10.1021/acs.joc.7b01752

Total Synthesis of β-<scp>d</scp>-<i>ido</i>-Heptopyranosides Related to Capsular Polysaccharides of <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i> HS:4

2017· article· en· W2746860940 on OpenAlexafffund
Pengfei Zhang, Rachel Hevey, Chang‐Chun Ling

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryCampylobacter jejuniStereochemistryPolysaccharideAnomerTotal synthesisBiochemistryBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 6-deoxy-β-d-ido-heptopyranoside related to the capsular polysaccharides of C. jejuni HS:4 is very remarkable, owing to the unique, multifaceted structural features that have been combined into one molecule, which include (1) the rare ido-configuration, (2) the unusual 7-carbon backbone, and (3) the challenging β-(1→2)-cis-anomeric configuration. Two distinct strategies toward the total synthesis of this interesting target are reported. The first involved establishment of the β-d-idopyranosyl configuration from β-d-galactopyranosides, prior to a C-6-homologation extending the d-hexose to the desired 6-deoxy-d-heptose. However, this approach encountered difficulties due to the significantly reduced reactivity of the 6-position of the β-d-idopyranosides, so instead a second strategy was employed, which involved first carrying out a 6-homologation on the less flexible d-galactopyranose, followed by a very successful conversion to the desired β-d-ido-configuration found in the target heptopyranoside (2). This report is the first successful synthesis of the 6-deoxy-β-d-ido-heptopyranoside, which could possess interesting immunological properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207