MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746879555 · doi:10.13034/jsst.v10i1.111

An Analysis of the Toxicity of Dihydroxyacetone in Spray Tanners when Exposed to Ultraviolet Radiation

2017· article· en· W2746879555 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Dylan Hematillake

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Student Science and Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToxicityChemistryRadicalMaillard reactionHydrogen peroxideDihydroxyacetoneUltraviolet radiationFood scienceNuclear chemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryRadiochemistryGlycerol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dihydroxyacetone, recognized as DHA, is a common additive used in spray tans responsible for providing pigmentation to the skin similar to a UV tan via the set of mechanisms known as the Maillard Reaction. When exposed to UV light, chemicals may experience reduced stability and form free radicals, reactive species commonly associated with toxicity. In order for spray tans to be considered safe by Health Canada, DHA should remain stable when irradiated by UV light. This report aims to determine whether DHA is capable of exhibiting signs of toxicity when exposed to UV light by assessing the literature examining DHA stability in the presence of UV light. While the evidence presented suggests a potential source of toxicity induced by UV-degraded DHA, further studies must be conducted to examine the correlation between the concentration of DHA and the concentration of free radicals and hydrogen peroxide formed. This may allow for a greater understanding of its toxicity to humans and improve consumer safety. Dihydroxyacétone, reconnu comme le DHA, est un additive courant utilisé dans les autobronzants chargés de fournir de la pigmentation à la peau semblable à un bronzage UV via l’ensemble des mécanismes connus comme la réaction de Maillard. Lorsqu’ils sont exposés à la lumière UV, les produits chimiques peuvent éprouver la stabilité réduite et former des radicaux libres, des espèces réactives couramment associés à la toxicité. Pour que les bronzages UV soient considérés sûr par Santé Canada, le DHA devrait rester stable lorsqu’il est irradié par la lumière UV. Ce rapport a l’intention de déterminer si le DHA est capable de présenter des signes de toxicité quand exposé à la lumière UV en évaluant les études qui ont examiné la stabilité du DHA en présence de la lumière UV. Bien que de la preuve a été trouvé suggérant une source potentielle de la toxicité induite par la dégradation UV du DHA, d’autres études doivent être menées pour étudier la corrélation entre la concentration de DHA et la concentration des radicaux libres et le peroxyde d’hydrogène formé. Cela peut permettre une plus grande compréhension de sa toxicité au genre humain et d’améliorer la sécurité des consommateurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Student Science and TechnologySame topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207