The effects of dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium in pediatric under total intravenous anesthesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the effects of dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium in pediatric adenotonsillectomy under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA).Methods 60 children undergoing adenotonsillectomy under TIVA were randomly divided into experimental group (group A) and control group (group B).Anesthesia was induced than dexmedetomidine was infused at the rate of 0.2 μg/kg.h in group E and sodium chloride was infused at the same volume in group C after induction.Record the time of operation,drug withdrawal to conscious,retention time of recovery room,and the modified Aldrete score of reaching recovery room,according to the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium to mark the delirium of the patient in the future 30 minutes per 5 minutes,the highest score is used to effective value.and at the same time,mark the degree of pain according to the modified Children' s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale.Results There was no statistical significance in comparation with group C and group E,the time of drug withdrawal to conscious,retention time of recovery room,and the modified Aldrete score of reaching recovery room (P ＞ 0.05).Pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) of group E (9.4 ± 1.8) was significantly lower than group C (13.8 ± 2.2) (P ＜ 0.05),pain of group E (3.8 ± 0.6) was significantly lower than group C (4.8 ± 0.8) (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can decrease the incidence rate of emergence delirium in pediatric adenotonsillectomy under TIVA. Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Total intravenous anesthesia; Emergence delirium
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".