MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746956136 · doi:10.7202/1040827ar

War and Predatory Economy in Northern-Kenya: How Ethnomusicology Can Explore Social Change

2017· article· fr· W2746956136 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Giordano Marmone

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d histoire · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyPolitical scienceAllianceSociologyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La pratique des vols de bétail entre populations pastorales et agro-pastorales a constitué, probablement pendant des siècles, une des formes principales d’activité militaire en Afrique de l’Est ainsi qu’un dispositif incontournable pour la construction du masculin à l’échelle locale. À la moitié des années 1990, dans le Samburu County, au nord du Kenya, un afflux soudain et imposant d’armes automatiques provenant des territoires en guerre de la partie orientale du continent a produit un changement radical des anciens paradigmes de mise en place des razzias. Chez les communautés samburu du mont Nyiro le bouleversement profond des pratiques du conflit a altéré les relations politico-hiérarchiques entre les membres des statuts d’âge des « guerriers » et des anciens en entraînant une alliance militaire aux proportions inédites. L’activité musicale cérémonielle, témoin inattendu de cette transformation, constitue un des espaces d’interaction au sein desquels les nouveaux agencements du système d’âge émergent de manière explicite et sont reproduits dans le temps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.017
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d histoireSame topicRangeland Management and Livestock EcologyFrench-language works237,207