MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746963767 · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2011.08.001

Book review

2011· article· en· W2746963767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ken Zafren

Bibliographic record

VenueWilderness and Environmental Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanAdventureSection (typography)DreamArcticArt historyWhite (mutation)North poleSculptureThe arcticHistoryGeographyGeologyArchaeologyPhysical geographyComputer scienceOceanographyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If you dream of adventure in frozen landscapes, this book may be for you. However, this coffee table book is not for everyone. It is written in French, German, and English, but not in the usual manner of books in 3 languages. There is parallel text in only a few places. Those who don't read all 3 languages will have to content themselves with looking at the photos in many of the chapters. The entire book is well-illustrated, although most of the images are of horizontal white landscapes with and without camps or warmly clad people. There are also some photos of polar bears, gear, and settlements. The first section: “Annäherung an die Polargebiete” (Approach to Polar Regions) is written mostly by invited authors. This section is divided into 4 parts. The first part, “Ice,” includes chapters on “The Arctic and the International Polar Year” and “Inuit Sculpture” (in French), as well as “Polar Bears Don't Eat Penguins … Geographical Notes about the Arctic” (in German), and “Dog Sledging in Greenland” (in English). The other 3 parts are comprised of a short philosophical section, with the title “Flow,” and 2 practical parts of one chapter each. The first covers the use of large kites for propulsion (in German); the second gives advice for traveling in polar bear country (in English). The second and third sections of the book recount 2 expeditions by the author, Patrick Peters, a polar explorer from Luxembourg. The first trip was to the North Pole in 2003, the other across Greenland in 2008. Each section contains some assorted information, some tips for polar travel, and an account of the expedition. The expedition sections also contain detailed gear lists. Ice-Flow is not so much a unified book as a compilation of random information about the Arctic and polar travel in large format with photographs. The chapters on kites and polar bears might be useful for anyone planning a polar trip. Those who must have everything published about Arctic exploration or who want to impress their friends with their erudition will want to buy this book.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3140.206

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWilderness and Environmental MedicineSame topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207