MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746990344 · doi:10.1190/segam2017-17782228.1

5D seismic reconstruction via parallel matrix factorization with randomized QR decomposition

2017· article· en· W2746990344 on OpenAlexaff
Fernanda Carozzi, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrix decompositionQR decompositionFactorizationComputer scienceRank (graph theory)AlgorithmTensor (intrinsic definition)Matrix (chemical analysis)Tensor decompositionMathematicsCombinatoricsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for 5D denoising and regularization of pre-stack seismic data is presented. The technique is based on the combination of the Parallel Matrix Factorization (PMF) method and a randomized QR decomposition, which relaxes the requirement to determine the exact rank of the reconstruction. The method yields high-quality results at computational cost comparable to that of the original PMF algorithm. We include synthetic and real data examples to evaluate the algorithm. Presentation Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 Start Time: 2:40 PM Location: 360A Presentation Type: ORAL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTensor decomposition and applicationsFrench-language works237,207