MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747040933 · doi:10.1115/gt2017-63736

Erosion Properties of Ceramic Composite Material Based on Nano-Mullite Whisker and Zirconia-Toughened Alumina

2017· article· en· W2747040933 on OpenAlexafffund
Fabian Erazo, Taylor Robertson, Xiao Huang, Rick Kearsey, Qi Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 6: Ceramics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced materials and composites
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceMulliteWhiskerWhiskersCubic zirconiaCeramicComposite materialComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The improvement of bulk ceramic properties through the addition of a secondary or even tertiary phase is a field of research that has been actively pursued since the mid twentieth century. This pursuit has become more relavent with the adoption of ceramic phases to protect structural components within the hotpath of gas turbines. Improving the properties of these ceramic coatings and tiles has the potential of reducing catastrophic damage events leading to an overall reduction in unplanned maintence and downtime. To date, Several approaches have been undertaken to improve the physical properties of these ceramics including preferential microstructural grain growth and doping to develop metastable crystal phases. This paper examines the effect of whisker additions to a mechanical mixture of oxide ceramics on the erosion properties. The baseline structure is a mechanical mixture of zirconia and alumina particles in the ratio of 89.8vol% alumina to 10.2vol% partially stabalized zirconia. A ratio of 20.0vol% mullite whiskers is incorporated into the structure as a toughening agent. The mullite whiskers are grown using a molten salt method. The overall structural composition is 20.0vol% mullite whiskers, 8.2vol% partially stabilized zirconia, and 71.8vol% alumina. This whisker toughened material is compared to a baseline 89.8vol% alumina 10.2vol% zirconia ceramic. Erosion tests were conducted using a 50 μm diameter alumina erodant with a velocity of 104 m/s. Impingement angles of 30°, 60° and 90° were examined to determine the effect of whisker additions at steeper attack angles. Despite the increased hardness, tensile strength and fracture toughness, whisker-enhanced zirconia-toughened alumina has shown similar erosion rate as non-reinforced ZTA at 30° ad 90° and much higher erostion at 60°. It can be surmised that whisker-enhanced toughening of ceramics has little positive effect on the erosion resistance of ceramics at room temperature and is potentially harmful. Microstructure analysis results are also presented within to illustrate the erosion material removal mode under different conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 6: Ceramics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; Manufacturing Materials and MetallurgySame topicAdvanced materials and compositesFrench-language works237,207