MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747143180 · doi:10.13034/jsst.v10i1.116

Revolutionizing Cancer Therapeutics: Molecular Pathways and Techniques in Cancer Immunotherapy

2017· article· en· W2747143180 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bea Co

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Student Science and Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunotherapyCancer immunotherapyCancerMedicineCancer cellCancer treatmentCancer researchImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contrary to conventional cancer therapies, immunotherapy manipulates an individual’s body cells to fight cancer, enhancing the active and dynamic immune interactions between the tumour and host. Cancer immunotherapy provides evidence of success through a variety of treatment approaches. Utilizing T-cells and antibodies, immunotherapy strategies such as T-cell engaging bodies, checkpoint inhibitors and engineered T-cells have significantly increased the chance of survival for many cancer patients. The combinations of these immunotherapies have also granted greater success in the elimination of tumour cells. Immunotherapy breakthroughs have the potential to have a lasting impact on cancer treatment. This literature review sheds light on the importance in further research for cancer immunotherapy and a glimpse at all of its powerful results. Contrairement aux méthodes conventionnelles de traitement anti-cancereux, l’immunothérapie manipule les cellules somatiques d’un patient pour battre contre le cancer, améliorant les interactions immunitaires actives et dynamiques entre la tumeur et l’hôte. Par une variété de méthodes de traitement, il y a une abondance de preuve qui montre le succès exceptionnel dans l’utilisation de l’immunothérapie contre le cancer. Les stratégies immunothérapeutiques, par exemple l’utilisation des anticorps bispécifiques qui engagent les cellules T, des inhibiteurs de checkpoint et les cellules T ingénierées, ont augmenté considérablement la chance de survie pour beaucoup de patients frappés par le cancer. Les combinaisons de ces immunothérapies ont aussi permis des grands succès avec l’élimination des cellules cancéreux. L’immunothérapie a mené à des nombreuses percées qui vont avoir un impact durable sur le traitement de cancer. Elle fournit continuellement des nouvelles découvertes qui ont déjà commencées de révolutionner les thérapies de cancer. Cette revue littéraire éclaircit l’importance de la continuation des recherches concernant l’immunothérapie pout le cancer et donne aussi un aperçu de tous ses résultats puissants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Student Science and TechnologySame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207