MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747147268 · doi:10.1002/cnma.201700183

Acquiring an Efficient Warm‐CO<sub>2</sub> Sorbent from Advanced Pyrolysis of Magnesium Oxalate

2017· article· en· W2747147268 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Yan Li, Xiao Sun, Xin Dong, Ying Wang, Jian Hua Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemNanoMat · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSorbentFlue gasAdsorptionPyrolysisMagnesiumPorosityMaterials scienceSpecific surface areaOxalateChemical engineeringNitrogenSolventSalt (chemistry)MineralogyInorganic chemistryChemistryMetallurgyComposite materialOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For the first time, porous MgO with a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area over 200 m2 g−1 can be simply obtained from pyrolysis of common magnesium oxalate without any solvent or additive. The obtained porous MgO had a large surface area of 278.5 m2 g−1 and captured 30.8 mg g−1 of CO2 in the instantaneous adsorption at 473 K, comparable with many MgO‐based sorbents prepared through complex procedures. Use of a U‐pipe furnace along with the specific “throughout” sweeping mode of nitrogen carrier gas enable this efficient warm‐CO2 sorbent to be fabricated in a simple way. Factors including contacting modes between precursor salt and flowing gas, flow rate, type of gas and salt were carefully studied, and related to the pore structure and adsorption character of the MgO samples. Apart from the capability of trapping CO2 mixed with SO2 and NO at 473 K, the MgO sample showed a high ratio of exposed strong basic sites (70.5 %), which provides a useful solid strong base for control of CO2 in flue gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemNanoMatSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207