MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747256289 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2017.1368713

Impact of climate change and race evolution on the epidemiology and ecology of stripe rust in central and eastern USA and Canada

2017· article· en· W2747256289 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Becky Lyon, Kirk Broders

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverwinteringClimate changeEcologyStripe rustGeographyPuccinia striiformisRust (programming language)Race (biology)BiologyResistance (ecology)EpidemiologyPlant disease resistanceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stripe rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), is one of the most devastating diseases of wheat globally. Since 2000, the geographic footprint of Pst has increased in North America due to a combination of changing weather patterns and introductions of new and more virulent strains. Pst is endemic throughout North America, but the emergence of new virulent strains poses an increased risk to wheat cultivation. As climate changes, so will the overwintering and over-summering range of this pathogen, resulting in earlier and more severe disease epidemics in the central and eastern USA and Canada. This perspective aims to highlight the changes taking place in Pst ecology and epidemiology over the last decade in North America, and then presents recommendations for future research to prepare for the changing dynamics of stripe rust. Specifically, to manage stripe rust in the future, molecular surveillance mechanisms need be established to identify and track new virulent races, and to obtain a deeper understanding of the adaptive ability of Pst. This will allow for a better explanation of how new races of Pst emerge, and encourage the development of improved epidemiological models and durable resistance strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207