Group Work Camp: A once in a blue moon unique experience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: In this article, a two and a half day experiential Group Work Camp experience, sponsored by the International Association of Social Work with Groups (IASWG) and held for professional groupworkers, educators, and students is described after pinpointing motivations for attending and participant benefits including self-care, learning to learn from experiences and making connections. Group Work Camp activities offer participation in nondeliberative forms of practice which stimulate learning in diverse and creative ways. In conclusion, it is strongly suggested to multiply Group Work Camp opportunities for groupworkers to enhance practices, load toolboxes, integrate knowledge, develop competencies, increase networks, and to maintain and enhance professional passion for groupwork as an alternative to traditional trainings.Keywords: Group Work Camp; nondeliberative practice; social work with groups; groupwork
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it