MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747288449 · doi:10.5539/ass.v13n9p158

Efficiency Analysis of Indonesian Coffee Supply Chain Network Using A New DEA Model Approach: Literature Review

2017· article· en· W2747288449 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nia Rosiana, Rita Nurmalina, Ratna Winandi, Amzul Rifin

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainIndonesianBusinessIndustrial organizationProduct (mathematics)Position (finance)CommerceMarketingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A position of Indonesia as the world’s biggest producer of robusta coffee has declined. Currently, Vietnam is the main producer of robusta coffee in the world. A decline in Indonesia's position is due to saturation of the Indonesian coffee export destination countries which results in declining demand for export of Indonesian coffee. The quantity of Indonesian robusta coffee supplied to the international market depends on secured supply of domestic raw materials and the efficiency of supply chain network. Efforts to ensure the domestic coffee supply is done through efficiency analysis on each member of the supply chain that forms the supply chain network. Efficiency measurement in supply chain network is performed using the New DEA Model developed by Liang et al. The measurement technique of DEA is gradually the efficiency of the production unit (product flow) of each actor (seller and buyer) on the supply chain. The efficiency level of each actor can determine the efficiency of the supply chain network. This is because of the relationship of input and output between seller and buyer so that the final output of supply chain network will produce. New DEA model is more appropriate to use in supply efficiency mechanism that can be cooperative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactFrench-language works237,207