MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747399005 · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3677

Estimates of burden and consequences of infants born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries with INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup>standard: analysis of CHERG datasets

2017· article· en· W2747399005 on OpenAlexaff
Anne CC Lee, Naoko Kozuki, Simon Cousens, Gretchen A Stevens, Hannah Blencowe, Mariângela Freitas da Silveira, Ayesha Sania, Heather Rosen, Christentze Schmiegelow, Linda S. Adair, Abdullah H Baqui, Fernando C. Barros, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Laura E. Caulfield, Parul Christian, Siân E. Clarke, Wafaie Fawzi, Rogelio González, Jean H. Humphrey, Lieven Huybregts, Simon Kariuki, Patrick Kolsteren, John Lusingu, Dharma Manandhar, Aroonsri Mongkolchati, Luke C. Mullany, Richard Ndyomugyenyi, Jyh Kae Nien, Dominique Roberfroid, Naomi Saville, Dianne J. Terlouw, James M. Tielsch, César G. Victora, Sithembiso Velaphi, Deborah Watson‐Jones, Barbara Willey, Majid Ezzati, Joy E Lawn, Robert E. Black, Joanne Katz

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentUNICEFCenters for Disease Control and PreventionUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentNational Institutes of HealthBill and Melinda Gates FoundationNutrition Third WorldThailand Research FundJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthWellcome TrustEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentWorld Health OrganizationEuropean Commission
KeywordsGestational ageLow and middle income countriesMedicineSmall for gestational ageDemographyPediatricsPregnancyDeveloping countryEconomicsBiologyEconomic growthGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b>Objectives</b>&nbsp;To estimate small for gestational age birth prevalence and attributable neonatal mortality in low and middle income countries with the INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> birth weight standard. <b>Design</b>&nbsp;Secondary analysis of data from the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG), including 14 birth cohorts with gestational age, birth weight, and neonatal follow-up.&nbsp;Small for gestational age was defined as infants weighing less than the 10th centile birth weight for gestational age and sex with the multiethnic, INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> birth weight standard.&nbsp;Prevalence of small for gestational age and neonatal mortality risk ratios were calculated and pooled among these datasets at the regional level.&nbsp;With available national level data, prevalence of small for gestational age and population attributable fractions of neonatal mortality attributable to small for gestational age were estimated. <b>Setting</b>&nbsp;CHERG birth cohorts from 14 population based sites in low and middle income countries. <b>Main outcome measures</b>&nbsp;In low and middle income countries in the year 2012, the number and proportion of infants born small for gestational age; number and proportion of neonatal deaths attributable to small for gestational age; the number and proportion of neonatal deaths that could be prevented by reducing the prevalence of small for gestational age to 10%. <b>Results</b>&nbsp;In 2012, an estimated 23.3 million infants (uncertainty range 17.6 to 31.9; 19.3% of live births) were born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries. Among these, 11.2 million (0.8 to 15.8) were term and not low birth weight (≥2500 g), 10.7 million (7.6 to 15.0) were term and low birth weight (&lt;2500 g) and 1.5 million (0.9 to 2.6) were preterm. In low and middle income countries, an estimated 606 500 (495 000 to 773 000) neonatal deaths were attributable to infants born small for gestational age, 21.9% of all neonatal deaths. The largest burden was in South Asia, where the prevalence was the highest (34%); about 26% of neonatal deaths were attributable to infants born small for gestational age. Reduction of the prevalence of small for gestational age from 19.3% to 10.0% in these countries could reduce neonatal deaths by 9.2% (254 600 neonatal deaths; 164 800 to 449 700). <b>Conclusions</b>&nbsp;In low and middle income countries, about one in five infants are born small for gestational age, and one in four neonatal deaths are among such infants. Increased efforts are required to improve the quality of care for and survival of these high risk infants in low and middle income countries

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations389
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207