Archaeal MutS5 tightly binds to Holliday junction similarly to eukaryotic MutSγ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archaeal DNA recombination mechanism and the related proteins are similar to those in eukaryotes. However, no functional homolog of eukaryotic MutSγ, which recognizes Holliday junction to promote homologous recombination, has been identified in archaea. Hence, the whole molecular mechanism of archaeal homologous recombination has not yet been revealed. In this study, to identify the archaeal functional homolog of MutSγ, we focused on a functionally uncharacterized MutS homolog, MutS5, from a hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii (phMutS5). Archaeal MutS5 has a Walker ATPase motif-containing amino acid sequence that shows similarity to the ATPase domain of MutSγ. It is known that the ATPase domain of MutS homologs is also a dimerization domain. Chemical cross-linking revealed that purified phMutS5 has an ability to dimerize in solution. phMutS5 bound to Holliday junction with a higher affinity than to other branched and linear DNAs, which resembles the DNA-binding specificities of MutSγ and bacterial MutS2, a Holliday junction-resolving MutS homolog. However, phMutS5 has no nuclease activity against branched DNA unlike MutS2. The ATPase activity of phMutS5 was significantly stimulated by the presence of Holliday junction similarly to MutSγ. Furthermore, site-directed mutagenesis revealed that the ATPase activity is dependent on the Walker ATPase motif of the protein. These results suggest that archaeal MutS5 should stabilize the Holliday junction and play a role in homologous recombination, which is analogous to the function of eukaryotic MutSγ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".